Our next leg from Bermuda will be about 900 miles and that could take us
9 days. We carry only enough fuel for
about 3 days. So studying the wind
becomes central to our travel plans.
We’ve been doing this and today looks like our day to move to St.
Maarten.
While I do not expect anyone to be waiting for the next
installment of my blog, I thought I’d take this opportunity to describe a bit
of the bigger picture…..
So Why Do This Research?
Science requires you attend to details but
sometimes it is good to step back and consider the bigger picture. In case the science interests you, read on….
Science of the bigger
picture
We live in the Anthropocene.
This is the most recent period of significant biological change. Paleontologists have names for each period
when life on Earth changes. Animals with shells and hard parts appeared over
500 million years ago during a period called the Cambrian. Dinosaurs ruled land during the Triassic,
Jurassic and Cretaceous periods of the Mesozoic Era. More recently, in the Cenozoic Era of the
Eocene period, modern reef fishes evolved.
During the Pleistocene glaciers covered the poles and during the Holocene,
humans evolved. The Anthropocene
describes the period when the biosphere was clearly affected by human activity.
There is no place on Earth where human presence cannot be
detected. Some impacts are conspicuous
such as forest clear-cutting but others are subtle such as global warming and
ocean acidification of our world. The scale
of the climate and atmospheric effects is huge – in some ways it is global. This can have profound effects on lots of
critters but none are more affected than coral reefs. For example, when ocean temperatures coral
reef exceeds its average summer temperature by more than about 2 degrees C,
corals bleach. Coral bleaching occurs
when tiny, but useful, algae that live within the corals are expelled and
corals bleach white.
Bleached brain corals (right side of left photo is not bleached). Bonaire
| ||
Another bleached brain coral from Bonaire 2010 |
Most climate scientists have concluded that the burning of
fossil fuels creates a greenhouse condition in which sunlight turned into heat
when it strikes Earth, becomes trapped in this greenhouse. Carbon dioxide also readily reacts with water
creating carbonic acid. This resulted in
the acidification of the world’s oceans.
Plants and animals that create limestone skeletons such as
lobsters, sea urchins and coral, invest metabolic energy to calcify. With ocean acidification, the cost of doing
the business of calcification has gone up.
Many reef scientists fear that thermal-stress of global warming and
ocean acidification have created a ‘double whammy’ that may have serious
synergistically negative impacts on coral reefs.
Getting from what we
know, to what we don’t know
Reef corals have declined in abundance over the past
half-century (at least). Coral reefs as
with most ecosystems are named for their dominant organism, reef corals. Since reef corals are declining in abundance,
coral reef ecosystems are threatened. On
many reefs, as corals decline, seaweed increases in abundance. Given that in the 1970s seaweed was rare
throughout the Caribbean, the trend is clear but what drives this trend is
hotly debated.
Coral reefs in Jamaica (Discovery Bay) shifting to seaweed reefs between 1978 and 1988 Top two and bottom two photos were taken at exactly the same locations. |
Could climate change and ocean acidification have caused the
decline in coral reefs? Perhaps.... but
there are other, non-mutually exclusive ideas as well. Some scientists argue instead that the
increase in seaweed is due to nutrient increases that stimulate their
growth. Seaweed can smother and even
poison coral so that’s a plausible explanation.
Others argue that over fishing coral reef fishes – especially those that
graze down seaweed resulted in the blooms of algae. Still others wonder if fish are important at
all perhaps it was the decline in grazing long-spined sea urchins that resulted in the
seaweed bloom.
The fact is, not all coral reef ecosystems have declined.
The coral reefs in Bonaire remain relatively healthy with a high coral
cover. So, why have some (perhaps most)
coral reefs declined but others remain healthy?
Healthy coral reefs of Bonaire (note high coral cover, little seaweed) |
Looking for the
perfect laboratory
With this background, I sought to find the best place to
explore the question of what’s plaguing the health of Caribbean coral
reefs. I focused on the low islands of
the eastern Caribbean because they are dry and have little runoff, the Trade
Winds and the north equatorial current bathes them in clear tropical seawater
with a minimum of upstream pollution.
Since all of the eastern Caribbean islands are in a relatively small
north to south archipelago, it is reasonable that global warming and ocean
acidification will affect the reefs in similar ways. So, by studying similar reef zones from
island to island we can see if the reefs differ. If they do, it likely the result of local factors
such as the fish fauna rather than pollution, climate or atmospheric stresses. This is not to say the other factors are
unimportant but that they may not be the sole drivers of the health of coral
reefs.
The Caribbean. Note the small dot to the north is Bermuda (image: Google Earth) |
The Antilles of the eastern Caribbean. My study sites for this expedition (image Google Earth) |
How do you find the ‘pulse’ of a coral reef?
For the last 20 years, several colleagues and I have worked to develop rapid assessment protocols for Caribbean coral reefs. The gold standard for such assessments is the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment known as “AGRRA” (http://www.agrra.org/index.html). Over the years, research my students and I have conducted rapid assessments to characterize all the important reef organisms (especially coral, algae and fishes) with only a few dives per reef. Since 1997 I’ve conducted AGRRA-like surveys in the Bahamas, St. Croix, St. John, Bonaire, Mexico, Belize, Honduras and Guatemala. My work in Mexico along with AGRRA surveys at 38 other sites conducted by over 100 scientists was published in July 2003 in Atoll Research Bulletin (free to download at the AGRRA site).
For the last 20 years, several colleagues and I have worked to develop rapid assessment protocols for Caribbean coral reefs. The gold standard for such assessments is the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment known as “AGRRA” (http://www.agrra.org/index.html). Over the years, research my students and I have conducted rapid assessments to characterize all the important reef organisms (especially coral, algae and fishes) with only a few dives per reef. Since 1997 I’ve conducted AGRRA-like surveys in the Bahamas, St. Croix, St. John, Bonaire, Mexico, Belize, Honduras and Guatemala. My work in Mexico along with AGRRA surveys at 38 other sites conducted by over 100 scientists was published in July 2003 in Atoll Research Bulletin (free to download at the AGRRA site).
So by conducting rapid assessments on similar reef-types at
the same depth allows us to determine if significant differences exist among
reefs. I'll get into the details of the differences we are looking for a bit later. Nevertheless, if differences are found among
islands, an excellent question would be, why are they different? It is a bit premature for me to speculate on
this but suffice to say, I do have a plan on how to proceed.
No comments:
Post a Comment